
Today, douchebag Chris Brown was sentenced to a few (er, proverbial) slaps on the wrist after pleading guilty to bludgeoning Rihanna’s face last February before the Grammys.
Community service in Virginia, 5 (probably reducible) years of probation, reform-oriented classes on, uh, why domestic violence is wrong. There’s a lot of noise in the press about Rihanna wanting the court order that keeps him the hell away from her dissolved, or at least reduced. That’s her business, and for all we know, this unjusifiable behavior may never go down between the two of them again. That doesn’t change the fact that this is a gesture typical of battered women—reaching out to their violent partners and allowing them back in their lives—that leads to a cycle of abuse.
You know, back when Britney’s teenaged thighs were taunting us from under a plaid schoolgirl uniform—we all remember that little number from the video for, ahem, “(Hit Me) Baby One More Time”—I never sided with the people who thought she should be a spokesperson for pre-marital virginity. The hypocrisy of it was too absurd, and, as it turned out, it heralded a very long eight years of fascist moralizing on American values.
But now I’m struggling with the question of whether or not Rihanna—regardless of her own choices viz. her future relationship with Brown—should come forward and publicly acknowledge that what happened to her is absolutely not okay, that it happens to many women, and that it is under no circumstances justifiable. Because the fact is, after all, that she’s already been made an example of—another, reinforcing example, at that—of a long history of abuse. Keeping silent about it is its own very explicit statement. 
Meanwhile, some “legal expert” over at MTV.com is running his mouth aplenty, making the outrageous claim that, despite having avoided any time behind bars, Brown’s sentence is “a pretty tough deal.”
Yeah. You know what else is a tough deal? Having your face bashed in by Chris Brown. Rihanna could, and should, tell us something about that.